“Copy” Is Anything But a “Nearly Perfect” Novel

A+Nearly+Perfect+CopyA Nearly Perfect Copy tells two very different yet tangentially connected stories about copies—one involving cloning, the other art forgeries. Reeling from the devastating loss of her young son, Elm falls down a rabbit hole of science-fiction proportions when she discovers a way to potentially clone her son, thus returning him to her. Meanwhile, struggling painter Gabriel Connois gets involved in a lucrative art forgery plot as he puts to use his skills at creating paintings in the style of his great-grandfather, the renowned painter Marcel Connois.

Both stories could be compelling, fully-imagined stories in their own right; but author Allison Amend mashes these two stories together in a very trite and arbitrary way. While both characters are well developed, the parallel worlds they inhabit are hard to jump back and forth between. And Elm’s professional life as an art expert in an auction house distracts from her cloning plotline as Amend tries to make her career relevant to Gabriel’s life.

In the end, A Nearly Perfect Copy suffers from trying too hard. Amend is desperately trying to engage the reader in a conversation about copying, whether in art or in our personal lives. And although she has some valid arguments to present, her convoluted novel is not the ideal setting for such a discussion—especially with such depressing storylines weighing down the central characters and the novel’s tone.

You’ll Be “Reconstructing Amelia” Into the Wee Hours of the Night

15776309Attention Upper East Siders, Gossip Girl here…or rather, gRaCeFULLY here, your guide to the scandalous lives of Grace Hall prep school’s elite. So goes Kimberly McCreight’s addicting debut novel being rightfully hailed as this year’s Gone Girl. When Amelia jumps off her school’s roof after being charged with plagiarizing her Virginia Woolf paper, her lawyer mother Kate takes it upon herself to investigate her daughter’s death—since Amelia had zero suicidal tendencies and a passion for Woolf. Plus, Kate gets an anonymous text saying, “Amelia didn’t jump.”

The chapters jump between Kate in the present, uncovering her daughters’ secrets and Amelia’s past leading up to her death. Interspersed are text conversations, gRaCeFULLY posts, email exchanges that further illuminate the secrets these women are hiding. It’s an immersive structure that is imminently readable while also providing compelling commentary on the social media conversational gap between parents and children. There are also a lot of relevant plot points involving school bullying, Internet friendships, and adults’ responsibilities towards teenagers.

McCreight weaves in plot twists left and right that are both unpredictable and satisfying. Though not as dark and psychologically disturbing as Gone Girl, Reconstructing Amelia is a great, swift read that’ll keep you up until the wee hours, trying to uncover all the secrets. This is one novel that should be at the top of your summer reading pile (right after this and this, of course).

Jonathan Dee Owes “A Thousand Pardons” for His Mediocre Novel

Jonathan Dee’s new novel, A Thousand Pardons, explores second chances and the ever-changing concept of the American Dream. Starting with cliché suburban couple Ben and Helen Armstead and their adopted daughter Sara, Pardons follows the detonation of this family and their attempts to find some form of a livable existence. While at times humorous, the novel fails to reach any true level of enlightenment.

15732607When Ben’s drunk driving accident brings shame on his family, he divorces himself from their lives and clocks in some time in jail. Having to work for the first time in nearly two decades, Helen struggles to find a job in a completely different market from what she’s used to (computers and social media are not her forte). And teenage Sara is just so disillusioned with her parents’ drama and inevitably falls for the rebellious boy at her new school.

Dee does a great job of starting with a—painfully—cliché premise and taking it to an interesting place. His insight into the character’s psyches is at times fascinating while also lending itself to the methodical style of John Grisham. Although Helen’s storyline goes into an interesting direction (involving a nuanced PR tactic of apologizing for wrongdoing), the rest of the characters fall flat. But as the novel moves into thriller territory, Pardons seems to lose its own identity.

Maybe in the hands of a different writer, these characters could’ve been more engaging. Tom Perrotta could’ve really brought them to life, I’m sure; and had Grisham actually written it, the climax would’ve been a lot more thrilling. Sadly, Pardons never quite reaches its potential; making it just another mediocre novel about American life.

 

Everyone Should Immediately Devour “The Unchangeable Spots of Leopards”

unchangespotsKristopher Jansma’s debut novel The Unchangeable Spots of Leopards is the first great book of 2013 (and will probably be my favorite for the rest of the year). Tackling themes of identity and truth, Leopards follows a writers’ life as he attempts to pen a great novel. Everything he writes is based on truth, but slanted truth; and the more he continues to slant the truth the more his own personal truth becomes slanted.

Without ruining too much of the novel (since seeing it all unfold is a treat in itself), the story focuses on this unnamed writer, his best friend and rival writer Julian McMann, and the beautiful actress Evelyn Lynn Madison Demont. Their eccentricities bring them together but could potentially lead to personal destruction.

Jansma uses these characters for his own exploration in storytelling. Jansma’s story resembles those of  John Irving—just substitute leopards for bears and Luxembourg for Vienna—but with light, crisp prose in lieu of Irving’s denser style. His writing can be equally devastating and humorous—usually on the same page. And the book’s matroshka doll structure is reminiscent of David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas by way of Brideshead Revisited. There are so many layers and recurring motifs used throughout that you’ll want to reread the novel immediately to see what you missed (in similar fashion to Michael Ondaatje’s fascinating novel Divisadero).

Leopards can best be described as Jansma inadvertently (or maybe intentionally) writes in his novel: “It is the rare of sort of book that resembles nothing else and yet somehow seems intensely familiar. From the first line you feel your own heart begin to beat differently. Once it’s over you want to begin it again.” This perfectly sums up how reading this novel feels, and I definitely encourage you to devour this novel as soon as possible.

(Other) Similar Reads:

And I Said How About You See “Breakfast at Tiffany’s”

logoHolly Golightly returns to the pop culture consciousness this month in the form of a new Broadway adaptation. This time, Game of Thrones’ very own Mother of Dragons Emilia Clarke plays this iconic character opposite rising star Cory Michael Smith’s Fred. Closely adapted from Truman Capote’s classic novella, this new stage production sparkles with charm and wit (and fabulous costumes).

Starting in 1957, Fred returns to the old bar he used to frequent when his bartender buddy Joe (George Wendt) informs him of a new Holly Golightly spotting. Although apprehensive about the photos (provided by his old neighbor I.Y. Yunioshi—James Yaegashi), this does prompt Fred to regale the audience with the story of his dealings with Holly back in 1943 that led up to her disappearance. As Fred got enmeshed in the zany world of Holly and her friends, he had to face not only his seemingly romantic feelings for her but also his romantic feelings towards men.

With sliding sets and the expositional use of projected images, director Sean Matthias is able to keep the action and story moving at a delightful pace. Smith is a cool narrator, almost effortlessly jumping between speaking to the audience and interacting with the characters. Clarke is equally compelling as she emphasizes the charm and whimsy of Holly along with her darker past. And with the addition of Colleen Atwood’s costume design, this is a visually stunning production. (Also visually stunning are Smith and Clarke when they strip down for a bubble bath.)

The play is full of zany characters whose affectations are perfectly encapsulated by the actors playing them. Writer Richard Greenberg also draws on the darker themes of Capote’s novel to give audiences a different glimpse into this story than they are familiar with from the film. Ultimately, Breakfast at Tiffany’s strikes just enough comedic and dramatic chords to provide a perfect Broadway theatre experience.

Winter TV Roundup: The Good, the Bad, and the Unbearable

Each season brings us a fresh new crop of TV series. For those of us who obsessively watch television, this means a nicely plump workload of shows to sift through. For those who don’t, this means absolutely nothing at all. But if you fall into the latter category, then you may be missing out on some of this season’s best shows. So here’s my breakdown of new winter series and which ones you should be watching (and which ones you should avoid at all costs).

MV5BMjgzMjA2MDk0Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzc3ODM4OA@@._V1_SX214_The Carrie Diaries is The CW’s attempt to replace the now deceased Gossip Girl (RIP!). It’s a high school drama that showcases fashion and New York City (and also witty in-jokes that New Yorkers would get—and love). The twist is that this is a Sex and the City prequel series set in the 1980s. Based on Candace Bushnell’s YA novels (which are more enjoyable than some of her adult fodder), Carrie Bradshaw (AnnaSophia Robb) uses her familiar narration style to tell the story of her adolescence as she discovers her ambitions to live in NYC and write.

This is a fun, teen drama and should be experienced as such. The cast is well-equipped to bring exuberance to their compelling characters, and the story seems to be moving at a swift enough pace to keep things moving right along (Carrie already has two different boyfriends within 7 episodes).

Bottom Line: Best new teen show on TV and one of The CW’s strongest shows. Definitely worth watching, unless you despise the ‘80s.

(Airs Mondays at 8pm on The CW.)

The-following-posterKevin Williamson (Scream, The Vampire Diaries) has taken what he knows about vampires and transferred that knowledge into the serial killer series The Following. (It also incorporates the conspiratorial urgency of 24 with completely addicting nuance.) Years after capturing the Poe-obsessed serial killer Joe Carroll (James Purefoy), Ryan Hardy (Kevin Bacon) is drawn back into the fray as a cult following that takes orders from Carroll begins a killing spree. More than just straight thriller, The Following humanizes these killers, giving the show an extra dimension that is usually lacking in other cop shows.

While the explicit use of violence has everyone’s panties in a bunch, those torturous murder scenes are too disturbing to be considered glorifying. What’s more disturbing is how invested you become with these cult followers (especially as concerns the delicious bisexual love triangle between Emma, Jacob, and Paul). Just as we have learned to care about bloodthirsty vampires, Williamson strives to make us care about bloodthirsty killers (and that’s the scariest part of all).

Bottom Line: Mixing character-building flashbacks with accelerated storytelling, The Following keeps up a thrilling pace that quickly sucks you into the show. This is definitely the best new show of the season (and it’s already been renewed for a second season!)

(Airs Mondays at 9pm on Fox.)

tnt-monday-morningsIf you’re not up for getting invested in a cult of serial killers, perhaps you’d like to invest some feelings in the heartfelt show Monday Mornings. Based on Sanjay Gupta’s book, David E. Kelley focuses this medical drama on the M&M (morbidity & mortality) meetings that holds doctors accountable for the deaths of their patients. Put in the hot seat, doctors must defend their actions and learn from their devastating failures.

Unlike soapy medical shows (read: Grey’s Anatomy), Monday Mornings is a compelling emotional drama that makes both the doctors and their patients feel real. Due to the dire nature of many of the cases, patients tend to transcend the patient-of-the-week story and become recurring characters (especially the more litigious patients). While too many moments descend into overwrought emotionality, they are handled with enough skill by the stellar cast (Alfred Molina, Jamie Bamber, Jennifer Finnigan, and Ving Rhames) to come off as genuine and touching.

Bottom Line: If you’ve been looking for a medical drama or are just in need of some emotional release, then Monday Mornings should be on your radar.

(Airs Mondays at 10pm on TNT.)

The-Americans-FX-Poster-300x450If you love the ‘80s but can’t stand the exuberance of The Carrie Diaries, then the Cold War drama The Americans may be up your alley. Philip and Elizabeth Jennings (Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell) are Russian spies living in America. Balancing their idyllic American family lifestyle with their ingrained Russian patriotism, the couple must navigate the treacherous worlds of love and espionage.

Rhys and Russell do admirable jobs of drawing us into their drama, but to get fully hooked you must wade through the first two episodes before reaching true emotional engagement. The bland production design leaves the show bereft of visual stimuli (other than Rhys’ various Alias-esque disguises). While no true overarching stories have come to fruition, the foundation has been laid and the characters’ emotional dilemmas are entertaining enough (for now).

Bottom Line: Espionage intrigue should draw you into the show, but the anti-hero leads provide engaging performances to make you stay—it, too, has been renewed for a second season.

(Airs Wednesdays at 10pm on FX.)

ZERO-HOURHad Dan Brown written Taken, it probably would’ve resembled Zero Hour. When Hank’s (Anthony Edwards) wife Laila (Jacinda Barrett) is kidnapped by notorious criminal White Vincent (Michael Nyqvist), he must uncover the truth about a series of ancient clocks that predict not only the end of time—or “zero hour”—but also the most likely whereabouts of Vincent and his wife.

With twelve clocks in the mix (to represent the twelve disciples), you would think they would have plenty of Da Vinci Code sleuthing to last them a few seasons. But each episode reveals the location of the next clock while also enlightening us about famous historical figure’s conspiratorial pasts. Fortunately, this pacing is what makes the show so entertaining (as long as you get past the uninspired pilot episode). By the end of the third episode, enough twists have been inserted into the series that you’ll be begging for more.

Bottom Line: This adventuresome thriller will entertain you if you let it. It also serves as the perfect aphrodisiac for Brown’s upcoming new release Inferno.

(Airs Thursdays on ABC at 8pm.)

Cult-Poster-cult-31484975-620-912Cult is like the meta younger brother of The Following. Skeptical Jeff (Matthew Davis) gets sucked into cult intrigue when his brother goes missing. With the help of Skye (Jessica Lucas), the two navigate the murderous cult following that bases their actions on the hit TV series Cult (scenes from the show within the show are featured in each episode).

Unlike big brother The Following, Cult is a lifeless series. Even though I enjoy Davis and Lucas as actors, their acting is flat. And all the various layers of the show are just smoke-and-mirrors designed to hide how little substance the show really has.

Bottom Line: Avoid at all costs, and go watch The Following instead.

(The CW has already buried the show in the graveyard that is Fridays at 9pm.)

house-of-cards-final-posterLastly, for those of you who prefer to marathon shows in one weekend instead of enjoying the dissemination of plot development over 13 weeks, then House of Cards is perfect for you. This Netflix original series helmed by David Fincher will fill that Boss-sized hole in your heart (RIP!). Cards follows the revenge-y political machinations of spurned Majority Whip Francis Underwood (Kevin Spacey) along with his cold, calculating wife Claire (Robin Wright) and ambitious—yet naïve—journalist Zoe Barnes (Kate Mara).

The show is instantly addicting, and Netflix does its best to encourage bingeing behavior. Its only misstep is use of asides to the camera by Underwood to explain his thoughts in certain moments (which only serve to undermine the complexity of the series—if you can’t tell when Underwood is being manipulative then maybe you shouldn’t be watching this show). Thankfully, the asides become negligible (or at least less distracting) the farther you get into the series. Just be careful what you tweet about the show because, due to its watch-at-your-own-pace option, everything  (and conversely nothing) is a spoiler.

Bottom Line: If namedropping Fincher, Spacey, Wright, Mara, or Boss hasn’t convinced you already, then watch it because it is merely the first of Netflix’s groundbreaking new foray into scripted series.

(Airs on Netflix Streaming whenever you want it to.)

Holden Caulfield Is the Worst Kind of Teenager

Holden Caulfield is an iconic character in American literature. He’s an antihero, a rebel without a cause, who dislikes everything and everyone. As such, he endears himself to teenagers of any generation, who feel the angst and alienation he experiences. But there’s a time for rebellion and there’s a time to grow up.

catcher in the ryeReading The Catcher in the Rye as an adult exposes Caulfield as a problematic character. He considers everyone a phony (even hating actors because they are inherently phony in their acting), which just serves to make him, in turn, feel like a phony. His disdain for everything feels like a forced affectation he uses to make himself feel superior to everyone else—although he’s the one flunking out of schools left and right. It’s no wonder that disaffected teens find solace in this novel, but as an adult it is nearly impossible to find anything likable about him (I so desperately wanted him to get hit by one of those Madison Avenue buses he so despised).

It’s no surprise, however, that this novel is included on The List. J.D. Salinger’s writing so perfectly embodies the character of Caulfield that he feels all too real.  And any novel that isn’t about wizards or vampires yet can still grab a teenagers’ attention should deserve some praise. Caulfield serves as a prototype for hipsters, disliking mainstream things (like movies!) and wearing his red hunting cap as his own personal fashion statement. His imprint on American culture may be timeless, but the novel itself should only be experienced when you’re a teenager.

It Is Hard to Get Into “Where We Belong”

Emily Giffin’s latest novel is more of a family drama than a romantic comedy. Where We Belong centers around Marian Caldwell a successful TV showrunner (think Ruth in The Next Best Thing but prettier and on the East Coast) who is dating her executive boss, Peter Standish. But Marian is harboring a secret: when she was 18 she had a child and gave it up for adoption. When said daughter shows up on her doorstep one night, Marian’s life begins to fall apart.

Where We Belong (7/24/12) by Emily GiffinKirby, the daughter, has her own issues. Now 18, she’s feeling displaced in her home and around her family. She doesn’t feel like she fits in with her adoptive family anymore and her lack of ambition for the future drives her to discover her familial heritage. But as she soon learns, Marian told no one except her mother about her pregnancy, and Kirby’s appearance in her life causes her to face the consequences of that decision.

Giffin’s writing is always heartfelt and relatable. She taps into these characters and what their thoughts would be in this special situation. However, that doesn’t prevent the story from becoming cloying and juvenile. Kirby’s high school problems feel especially juvenile (some authors just can’t write convincing teenagers). Marian’s drama with Peter and her show also feel forced—just another way to complicate her already complicated life. Not until the two team up to find the father, Conrad, and reveal all to him, does the story become truly engaging.

Thanks to flashbacks in the beginning of the book, Conrad quickly becomes a more well-rounded character than Peter. Thus, Marian’s stray thoughts of Conrad, increase the reader’s hopes that she’ll take up with him; and, conversely, the reader’s dislike of Peter increases (even as he becomes actually likable halfway through the novel). However, because Conrad doesn’t truly appear until the final 100 pages, his potential as a love interest never fully grows to fruition, making the end of the novel feel slightly unresolved.

Although Where We Belong has some great moments and Kirby’s maturation throughout the novel makes her an eventually likable character, nothing really stands out in this novel as exceptional. After reading Griffin’s addictive novels Something Borrowed and its sequel Something Blue (which I fully endorse), this book was definitely a let down.

Recommended Chick Lit:

Avoid Getting Caught “In Between Men”

For all the great LGBT webseries out there, there are bound to be a few duds. In Between Men falls into that latter category. In the same style as Hunting Season, Men follows four gay men’s drama-filled lives in Manhattan. But other than voiceover narration, these two series share very little in common.

Dalton (Nick Matthews) is the leader of the bunch and an up-and-coming event planner. Although he prefers to work independently, Kendra (Margot Bingham) is luring him to come work for her high profile PR firm. Benjamin (Ben Pamies) is the requisite slut of the group, but Pamies gives him enough emotional depth to make him the only interesting male character. Jacob (Max Rhyser) is the bisexual artist in a long-term relationship with insecure bartender Kyle (Sidney E. Wright). And Dane (Chase Coleman) plays yet another insecure gay man, one who has to dole out pills to addicts in order to get laid.

In Between Men claims to focus on the masculine/feminine identity crisis that affects so many gay men (see also: Bro-ing Pains); but, aside from a disdainful view of Pride, the show ignores this theme after the first episode. Yet the lack of thematic concept isn’t what plagues the series, it’s that writer Quincy Morris seems unable to write a coherent episode. Each short “episode” is comprised of one or two scenes following each of the characters’ lives that almost comprise a complete story when watched all at once. While each episode does an adequate job of setting up the stories, it skips the middle portion and cuts right to their conclusion, making them not just anticlimactic but befuddling as well. And even Dalton’s contrived voiceovers can’t pull together the episodic stories.

Despite the poor structure of the series, Morris does have some interesting plot twists. The secret motives behind Kendra’s character make her the most compelling of the characters. But if the only female character on your gay male webseries is the only interesting character, then you’re doing something wrong. (And don’t get me started on Dalton’s schizophrenic Italian boyfriend Massimiliano played by Michael Sharon.)

When looking for a new webseries to delve into, be sure to avoid In Between Men (after all there are plenty of quality ones out there). Even as a guilty pleasure, the series elicits more guilt than pleasure.

 

It’s Never Too Late to Get Into “The Outs”

The Outs is the first webseries I’ve seen that could easily transition into an actual TV series (for cable, of course). The episodes are long enough, ranging from 20-30 minutes; and the incredible writing gives the show enough substance to make it very compelling, at times even emotionally devastating. Created by Adam Goldman along with Sasha Winters, The Outs explores the muddy waters of life after an intense breakup.

Mitchell (Goldman) and Jack (Hunter Canning) have had a dramatic breakup (the details of which are slowly revealed throughout the series) and are now trying to move on with their lives. Jack goes through a slutty phase, leading him to “Scruffy” (Tommy Heleringer). Meanwhile, Mitchell is trying to rehabilitate his close friendship with Oona (Winters), who was also greatly affected by the breakup, while also attempting to start dating again.

The show’s strong writing (also by Goldman) and crisp cinematography (Jay Gillespie) will quickly draw you into the series. Goldman’s playwright style of writing combined with a stage-like delivery of lines by the actors gives it an overall theatrical vibe that is lacking in many other webseries (i.e. In Between Men, The Vessel). The lengthier episodes, too, allow for more thorough character and plot development.

If the Manhattan lifestyle of Hunting Season makes it akin to Sex and the City, then the Brooklyn world of The Outs makes it akin to Girls (wouldn’t that make for a great hour of TV on HBO?). Both are outstanding webseries that prove that this form of media is yet another great way to express compelling storytelling.

You can watch all 6 episodes of the series here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,103 other followers